My Neville GoddardNeville Goddard on John 5:8
Executive Summary
Neville Goddard's interpretation of John 5:8, the command to the lame man to “Rise, take up thy bed, and walk,” serves as a direct correction to a literal, historical reading of scripture. He asserts that the common belief in this event as a physical miracle performed by an external, powerful man is a misunderstanding of the story's true meaning.
Key Concepts
- The story of the lame man at the pool is found in John 5.
- The central command discussed is, “Rise, take up thy bed, and walk.”
- The common interpretation is that a historical figure with miraculous power healed the man.
- Neville Goddard explicitly refutes this literal, historical interpretation.
Detailed Explanation
In his discussion of the fifth chapter of John, Neville addresses the story of an impotent man who is healed. The narrative culminates in the command from Jesus: “Rise, take up thy bed, and walk,” after which the man is immediately made whole.
Neville's primary interpretive point is to correct what he sees as a widespread misunderstanding of this account. He states that people typically read this and believe that a “strange man who possessed miraculous power” simply appeared and healed the lame man. Neville emphatically teaches that this view is incorrect. While the provided source material does not elaborate on his alternative psychological interpretation, it is clear that he rejects the idea of the story as a literal, historical event involving an external miracle worker.
Important Quotes
Jesus saith unto him, Rise, take up thy bed, and walk.
— Thinking Fourth-Dimensionally
You read this story and you think some strange man who possessed miraculous power suddenly said to the lame man, 'Rise and walk.'
— How To Manifest Your Desires
Common Misunderstandings
The primary misunderstanding Neville corrects is the belief that the healing of the lame man in John 5 was a historical event performed by a unique individual with external, miraculous powers. Neville teaches that this literal interpretation misses the true meaning of the scripture.
Practical Applications
The provided source material does not offer specific practical applications related to this verse. Its focus is on establishing the correct interpretive framework—moving from a literal to a psychological understanding—rather than detailing a technique.
Frequently Asked Questions
Did Neville Goddard believe a historical Jesus healed the lame man in John 5?
No. Based on the provided texts, Neville teaches that the common belief in a 'strange man who possessed miraculous power' performing this act is a misunderstanding of the story.
What is the common interpretation of John 5:8 that Neville corrects?
Neville identifies the common interpretation as the belief that a literal, historical person with miraculous abilities commanded a lame man to walk, and the man was physically healed by this external power.
Ask Neville about John 5:8
Find every place Neville interpreted this verse and ask how it connects to his teaching. Create a free account to begin.
Start chatting →